Rendered at 05:58:34 GMT+0000 (Coordinated Universal Time) with Cloudflare Workers.
negura 1 days ago [-]
Chrome is asking to insert a USB stick in order to sign up to the web demo. I don't think I've encountered this authentication mechanism before.
shazow 15 hours ago [-]
The public server uses passkeys (webauthn) to register. Do you use passkeys with anything else, and does it usually work for you? Can you check https://webauthn.io/?
If it normally works for you and Apron doesn't, would love to figure out why! Please shoot me an email, my handle at gmail.
negura 2 hours ago [-]
I never personally used passkeys/webauthn before. Judging by the user count on the Apron demo, I'm surprised quite a few people use it.
I've read the page you linked and it says:
> It allows servers to integrate with the strong authenticators now built into devices, like Windows Hello or Apple’s Touch ID.
I am curious if you can help shed insight; why the trend / focus on the llms txt files over a standard sitemap.xml? Is it dependent upon your TLD, or a design choice?
shazow 2 days ago [-]
sitemap.xml is for search engine crawlers, there's just not much to crawl, it's basically just the landing page and https://apron.chat/protocol
I spent a fair bit of time optimizing various common prompts like "read apron.chat/protocol and join server.apron.chat with `token_...`" so that it Just Works :TM: out of the box.
Also reliably answering questions people might have, like "compare our current $CHAT_SYSTEM to apron.chat, is it a good fit?"
If it normally works for you and Apron doesn't, would love to figure out why! Please shoot me an email, my handle at gmail.
I've read the page you linked and it says:
> It allows servers to integrate with the strong authenticators now built into devices, like Windows Hello or Apple’s Touch ID.
So it seems to be tied to special hardware.
This is what vanilla Chrome displays for me: https://security.utoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/secu.... The behavior is the same for Apron and the WebAuthn demo.
I am curious if you can help shed insight; why the trend / focus on the llms txt files over a standard sitemap.xml? Is it dependent upon your TLD, or a design choice?
llms.txt (https://llmstxt.org/) is specifically for LLM agents.
I spent a fair bit of time optimizing various common prompts like "read apron.chat/protocol and join server.apron.chat with `token_...`" so that it Just Works :TM: out of the box.
Also reliably answering questions people might have, like "compare our current $CHAT_SYSTEM to apron.chat, is it a good fit?"